Hunters Anglers Trappers Association of Vermont


HAT Chat  Board is Back!!

Message Board

Tell Governor Scott what You Think about Gun Control

Sportsman's Links

Register for H A T of Vermont email updates


Gun Owners
Of  Vermont

"Dedicated to a no-compromise position against gun control"

Other unsung environmental stewards are Vermont's Hunters, Anglers, and Trappers

who protect the values and traditions of outdoor sports  in our state. Last year, we started to treat the plague of lamprey  that are marring our fish. In the coming year, we must address the thinning deer herd to maintain the vitality of hunting in Vermont.

---Governor James H. Douglas, Second Inaugural Address "A Common Purpose, January 6, 2005

HAT Chat  Board is Back!!


New HAT Membership with Automatic Renewal
May be canceled at any time Membership is $20.00 per year

From: Hunters Anglers Trappers Association of Vermont

To: Membership

Subject: Critical Alert

Ladies and Gentlemen;

The Vermont Sporting Community finds itself at a critical juncture in our state’s history. Never before have we suffered such frontal attacks on our 2nd Amendment and Article 16 rights. The politicians who engineered this attack are counting on two things from the sporting community:

    1. They are counting on the belief that we will forget about these attacks by the time the election rolls around and we will somehow become distracted away from their actions. They have said as much openly in news articles and interviews.

    2. They also believe we will make a lot of noise but will not cast the votes necessary to clean them out of office. Historically, they are correct about this point and hence, this letter is being sent out by a number of sporting groups to their members as a call to action.

The Vermont Sporting Community MUST respond to these attacks at the ballot box. We are not advocating you vote for a particular candidate or party – just that you exercise your right (and your responsibility) to vote. We must make a great showing at the polls. We must elect politicians who will listen to the majority and act accordingly – not totally ignore them. Not sure who the Pro 2A/A16 candidates are? Find them here at Gun Owners of Vermont website -

Some folks will say their vote does not count but this is wrong. Many of the current legislators won their seats in 2016 by just a very few votes. If these attacks on our rights go unanswered, they will be emboldened to attack us again and again until we do not even recognize our once wonderful state.

This year, for the first time, it is legal to register to vote on the day of the election. So, if you have been putting off registration, it is never too late. You may go to the polls and request to register. You will be registered and then given a ballot to vote right away. If you prefer, you can register to vote on line here -

PLEASE consider what is at stake for yourself, your children and your grandchildren and get out and VOTE. The Primary election is coming up soon on August 14 and the General election will be the first Tuesday in November.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.



Gun Owner Alert !!!
If you own a gun or plan to own a gun – this alert applies to you

Vermont’s Gov. Scott has proven that his word is of zero value. He lied to the
sporting community to get elected and now he has brazenly attacked legal gun
ownership in the safest state in the union (according to the FBI)
Make no mistake – the Legislative House Leadership is against private gun
ownership and is feverishly working to generate new gun laws that WILL TAKE
AWAY YOUR 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS and Gov. Scott is encouraging them
to hurry up!
What can you do to help battle these gun grabbers?

ü Call your Representative and tell them you are opposed to ANY new gun
laws – do this right away as they are trying to rocket these laws through

ü Call the Governor’s Action Line and tell him you want no new gun laws
(802 828-3333)

ü Tell EVERYONE you know what is going on and encourage them to take
action – you cannot rely on the other guy to save your gun rights

ü If you aren’t already, REGISTER TO VOTE NOW!!!
ü This November, let these politicians know we will not tolerate their attack
on our community and our gun rights!!!

ü VOTE THEM OUT – Gov. Scott MUST GO – the gun grabbing down
country Liberals MUST GO

ü If YOU AND YOUR FRIENDS don’t take action NOW, you will lose your
gun rights FOREVER! DO NOT WAIT!!!

ü Volunteer to help the Organizations that are fighting for you in Montpelier.
You can hand out fliers and tell all your friends it’s now or NEVER
The Organizations fighting for you need your help. Gun Owners of VT and the Hunters Anglers Trappers Assoc.
Join them, support them and do whatever you can NOW!!!


These talking points were written by a prominent attorney who shares our passion for legal gun ownership and the 2nd Amendment in Vermont...

 1. There is no excuse for a lack of statistics on gun crime in Vermont. The anti-gun crowd likes to say that the lack of statistical data to support their positions is the result of the NRA suppressing record keeping and studying of “gun crime.” The incidence of shootings which cause injury or death to another person in Vermont are sufficiently infrequent and of such low number that recording and studying these events should require little effort. I think the anti-gun crowd does not want the data on “gun crime” in Vermont because not one person who has been killed or injured in a Vermont shooting would have been prevented by any of the current proposals. No legislator should support policy without knowing what impact the policy will have on the perceived problem. Before burdening tens of thousands of Vermonters with new restrictions and financial costs, the legislators should have good estimates of the number of transactions or items which will be burdened and the number of incidents in which a person will be saved from injury or death by new laws. Those estimates should be based on Vermont events that have actually happened. If they have not put in the effort to gather this data, an effort which will require little work, then the proposals should be delayed until they do their due diligence.

2. The House Judiciary Committee Members are Violating their Oath of Office (building on Bill Moore’s testimony). The Oath the legislators took was:

"I, ...................................................................., do solemnly swear (affirm) that as a member of this Assembly, I will not propose, or assent to, any bill, vote or resolution, which shall appear to me injurious to the people, nor do nor consent to any act or thing whatever, that shall have a tendency to lessen or abridge their rights and privileges, as declared by the Constitution of this State, but will, in all things, conduct myself as a faithful, honest Representative and guardian of the people, according to the best of my judgment and ability. (If an oath) So help me God. (If an affirmation) Under the pains and penalties of perjury.

"I do solemnly swear (affirm) that I will be true and faithful to the State of Vermont, and that I will not, directly or indirectly, do any act or thing injurious to the Constitution or Government thereof. (If an oath) So help me God. (If an affirmation) Under the pains and penalties of perjury.

"I do solemnly swear (affirm) that I did not at the time of my election to this body, and that I do not now hold any office of profit or trust under the authority of Congress. (If an oath) So help me God. (If an affirmation) Under the pains and penalties of perjury.

"I do further solemnly swear (affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States. (If an oath) So help me God. (If an affirmation) Under the pains and penalties of perjury."

The Vermont Constitution includes Article 16. Article 16 says “That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the State--and as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military should be kept under strict subordination to and governed by the civil power.” The House Judiciary Committee is proposing legislation which will abridge the rights of Vermont citizens protected from infringement by Article 16 without any reportable and verifiable facts or data which support the proposals. This is a dereliction of duty and a breach of their oath of office.

3. “Standard capacity” for a magazine is 17 rounds for a handgun and 30 rounds for a rifle. According to CBS news America's favorite guns the most produced gun in the US in 2016 was the semi-automatic pistol. Wikipedia has a list of most produced firearms The most produced guns on that list still in significant use in the US are the Glock 17, Colt 1911 and the Beretta 92. Two of those three (66%) of the most produced semi-automatic pistols still widely sold and used in this country have standard magazine capacity of 17 rounds. The 1911 has fewer rounds but is chambered in a larger caliber and does come in double stack capacity also which holds 14 rounds. The two top semi-automatic rifles on the list which are still in wide distribution and use in this country are the AK-47 and the AR-15. Both of these rifles have a standard magazine capacity of 30 rounds. Therefore, “high capacity” must be at least exceed the standard capacity of 17 rounds for a handgun and 30 rounds for a semi-automatic rifle.

4. Why are .380, 9mm, .45 and 10mm all treated the same for magazine capacity? The anti-gun crowd likes to say that magazine capacity is linked to lethality according to studies they can’t identify. Any discussion of handgun lethality should start with bullet caliber, not number. The gun-ignorant legislators should be given visual references to understand the difference in physical size of the various handgun calibers. They should be forced to explain why 15 rounds of .380 is more lethal than 10 rounds of 10mm.

5. Name the Murdered Vermonter who would still be alive if the gun who shot her only held 10 bullets. Can any legislator point to even one death that would have been prevented by a magazine capacity limit of 10 rounds? Vermont has been awash in guns since joining the Union in 1791. There are literally hundreds of thousands magazines in private ownership in Vermont which have a capacity of more than 10 rounds. If any single death was going to be caused by the 11th round from a single magazine, it would have happened by now. Again, don’t blame a lack of data proving that it didn’t happen on the NRA because there are so few shooting death incidents in Vermont to examine, there is no excuse for anyone supporting a magazine ban not knowing the answer to this question.

6. The Second Amendment Does not Apply to AR-15’s because the Founding Fathers had muskets and did not Imagine Modern Weapons of War. This is a favorite rote point by mindless legislators regurgitating what they saw on cable news. The Founding Fathers were less likely to have imagined cell phones or the internet than they were to have considered the development of better guns. Following this logic, the contents of the legislators cell phones should not be protected from warrantless seizure and search by the government because when the 4th Amendment was conceived, communication was done by writing on paper or shouting out the window. Speech on the internet should not be protected by the 1st Amendment because the Founding Fathers did not dream of youtube. Evangelical Christian and Southern Baptist religious practices should likewise not be protected from government interference because they did not exist in 1789.

7. There are no statistics which demonstrate that universal background checks will prevent one crime. Very few crimes in Vermont involve guns. The ATF is constantly tracing guns used in crimes. If guns used in crimes were obtained through private sales which would have been stopped by mandatory background checks, the ATF and the FBI would know about it. Again there are not so many of these incidents that record keeping and studying the particulars is difficult or particularly burdensome. The lack of data means that there is no data to report. There is no evidence that universal background checks will prevent disqualified persons from accessing firearms and until such evidence is gathered, infringing on Article 16 is a violation of the legislative oath of office.

8. Universal Background Checks will disadvantage the Poor and Indigent. A person working a minimum wage job will be heavily burdened by a background check to the point that it might make acquiring a gun for self-protection unaffordable. Why is there no discussion about limiting FFL fees or allocating public monies to pay the fees for the poor? Don’t they care about poor people or would they prefer that poor people don’t have guns?

9. Why do they assume FFL’s will handle background checks for private transfers? Are they going to require FFL’s to handle private transfers? What if no FFL within 100 miles of a rural community will agree to do private transfers or will only do them for an exorbitant fee? Have the legislators obtained surveys or polls from Vermont FFL’s about their willingness and fees to do background checks for private sales? Have they read Article 16? Do they remember taking an oath of office?

10. Is Giving FFL’s Immunity an Idea that they have really thought through? FFL dealers turn away a lot of potential sales that don’t feel right to them. Tort liability is a big incentive to keep FFL’s acting with appropriate caution in dealing with firearms transactions. If you strip tort liability from FFL holders in their dealings with the public, aren’t you creating a larger and more real risk of harm to the public than universal background checks is imagined to solve? If tort immunity will only apply to private transfers, isn’t that defeating the whole purpose? If FFL dealers don’t have to care about tort liability in private transfers, they aren’t going to exercise their judgment to prevent sales that don’t feel right to them.

11. Vermont’s high gun ownership rate and high suicide rate with guns are not related. We must not confuse correlation with causation. Just because two things exist at the same time does not mean they are related or that one has a causal effect on the other. Anti-gun liars try to dismiss the very low rate of gun homicides in Vermont by saying that Vermont does have lots of gun deaths when you factor in suicides (the VPR study on gun deaths from 2011 – 2016 found only 42 shooting homicides in that time which were not police killings and that 89% of gun deaths were suicides). Vermont also has a disproportionately high rate of opiate addiction. No one is arguing that gun ownership is driving people to opiate addiction although both exist in high numbers in Vermont. “Common Sense” tells me that the factors which are leading to high rates of drug addiction (depressing weather, few economic opportunities in rural communications, breakdown in social networks) are probably a lot more related to the high suicide rate than access to guns.

12. Vermont has had its High School Massacre (credit the folks at Vermont 2A for this one). Steve Bourgoin killed 5 Vermont high school students by intentionally driving his Toyota truck into the Volkswagen Jetta they were traveling in on Interstate 89. This is a tragic event in which a deranged person, reportedly under the influence of drugs, killed 5 innocent young people and shattered a community. That horrific event was more than a year and a half ago and within 30 miles of the Statehouse. What has the Vermont Legislature done in response to this actual tragedy which happened in our State and could happen again any day of the week and is at least or more likely to happen again than a school shooting.


(Draft No. 1.1 – S.55) Page 1 of 9
3/13/2018 - EBF - 01:21 PM
1 S.55
2 Representative LaLonde of South Burlington moves that the House propose
3 to the Senate that the bill be amended as follows:
4 First: By adding a new Sec. 8 to read as follows:
5 Sec. 8. 13 V.S.A. § 4021 is added to read
7 (a) A person shall not manufacture, possess, or transfer a large capacity
8 ammunition feeding device.
9 (b) A person who violates this section shall be imprisoned for not more
10 than one year or fined not more than $500.00, or both.
11 (c) This section shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any large
12 capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed on or before
13 the effective date of this act.
14 (d) This section not apply to any large capacity ammunition feeding device:
15 (1) manufactured for, transferred to, or possessed by the United States or
16 a department or agency of the United States, or any state or a department,
17 agency, or political subdivision of a state;
18 (2) transferred to or possessed by a state or federal law enforcement
19 officer for legitimate law enforcement purposes, whether the officer is on or off duty;

(Draft No. 1.1 – S.55) Page 2 of 9
3/13/2018 - EBF - 01:21 PM
1 (3) transferred to a licensee under Title I of the Atomic Energy Act of
2 1954 for purposes of establishing and maintaining an on-site physical
3 protection system and security organization required by federal law, or
4 possessed by an employee or contractor of such a licensee on-site for these
5 purposes, or off-site for purposes of licensee-authorized training or
6 transportation of nuclear materials;
7 (4) possessed by an individual who is retired from service with a law
8 enforcement agency after having been transferred to the individual by the
9 agency upon his or her retirement, provided that the individual is not otherwise
10 prohibited from receiving ammunition; or
11 (5) manufactured, transferred, or possessed by a licensed manufacturer
12 or licensed importer for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized
13 by the U.S. Attorney General.
14 (e) As used in this section, “large capacity ammunition feeding device”
15 mean a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device manufactured after
16 July 1, 2018 that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted
17 to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition, provided that “large capacity
18 ammunition feeding device” shall not include an attached tubular device
19 designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire
20 ammunition.

(Draft No. 1.1 – S.55) Page 3 of 9
3/13/2018 - EBF - 01:21 PM
1 Second: By adding a new Sec. 9 to read as follows:
2 Sec. 9. 13 V.S.A. § 4022 is added to read
4 (a)(1) A person shall not manufacture, possess, or transfer a semiautomatic
5 assault weapon.
6 (2) A person who violates this subsection shall be imprisoned for not
7 more than one year or fined not more than $1,000.00, or both.
8 (b) This section shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any
9 semiautomatic assault weapon otherwise lawfully possessed on the effective
10 date of this section.
11 (c)(1) As used in this section, “semiautomatic assault weapon” means:
12 (A) a semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable
13 magazine and has at least one of the following characteristics:
14 (i) a folder or telescoping stock;
15 (ii) a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of
16 the weapon;
17 (iii) a thumbhole stock;
18 (iv) a second handgrip or a protruding grip that can be held by the
19 nontrigger hand;
20 (v) a bayonet mount;

(Draft No. 1.1 – S.55) Page 4 of 9
3/13/2018 - EBF - 01:21 PM
1 (vi) a flash suppressor, muzzle break, muzzle compensator, or
2 threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor, muzzle break, or
3 muzzle compensator;
4 (vii) a grenade launcher; or
5 (B) a semiautomatic shotgun that has at least one of the following
6 characteristics:
7 (i) a folding or telescoping stock;
8 (ii) a thumbhole stock;
9 (iii) a second handgrip or a protruding grip that can be held by the
10 nontrigger hand;
11 (iv) a fixed magazine capacity in excess of seven rounds;
12 (v) an ability to accept a detachable magazine; or
13 (C) a semiautomatic pistol that has an ability to accept a detachable
14 magazine and has at least one of the following characteristics:
15 (i) a folding or telescoping stock;
16 (ii) a thumbhole stock;
17 (iii) a second handgrip or a protruding grip that can be held by the
18 nontrigger hand;
19 (iv) the capacity to accept an ammunition magazine that attaches
20 to the pistol outside the pistol grip;

(Draft No. 1.1 – S.55) Page 5 of 9
3/13/2018 - EBF - 01:21 PM
1 (v) a threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash
2 suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer;
3 (vi) a shroud that is attached to or partially or completely encircles
4 the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the nontrigger
5 hand without being burned;
6 (vii) a manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol
7 is unloaded; or
8 (viii) a semiautomatic version of an automatic rifle, shotgun, or
9 firearm; or
10 (D) a revolving cylinder shotgun.
11 (2) “Semiautomatic assault weapon” shall not include:
12 (A) any rifle, shotgun, or pistol that:
13 (i) is manually operated by bolt, pump, lever, or slide action;
14 (ii) has been rendered permanently inoperable; or
15 (iii) is an antique firearm as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(16); or
16 (B) a semiautomatic rifle that cannot accept a detachable magazine
17 that holds more than five rounds of ammunition;
18 (C) a semiautomatic shotgun that cannot hold more than five rounds
19 of ammunition in a fixed or detachable magazine; or
20 (D) any firearm, rifle, or shotgun that was manufactured at least
21 50 years prior to the effective date of this section.

(Draft No. 1.1 – S.55) Page 6 of 9
3/13/2018 - EBF - 01:21 PM
1 Third: By adding a new Sec. 10 to read as follows:
2 Sec. 10. 13 V.S.A. § 4023 is added to read:
3 § 4023. SAFE STORAGE
4 (a) A person shall not store or otherwise leave a firearm outside his or her
5 immediate possession or control without having first securely locked the
6 firearm in a safe storage depository or, by use of a tamper-resistant mechanical
7 lock gun lock or other device appropriate to that weapon, rendered it incapable
8 of being fired.
9 (b) A person who violates this section shall be imprisoned for not more
10 than one year or fined not more than $500.00, or both.
11 (c) As used in this section:
12 (1) “Firearm” shall have the same meaning as in subsection 4017(d)
13 of this title.
14 (2) “Safe storage depository” shall mean a safe or other secure container
15 that, when locked, is incapable of being opened without the key, combination,
16 or other unlocking mechanism so as to prevent an unauthorized person from
17 obtaining access to the weapon.
18 Fourth: By adding a new Sec. 11 to read as follows:

(Draft No. 1.1 – S.55) Page 7 o
3/13/2018 - EBF - 01:21 PM
1 Sec. 11. 13 V.S.A. § 4024 is added to read:
3 (a) A person shall not transfer a firearm to another person until 10 days
4 after the completion of the background check required by 18 U.S.C. § 922(s)
5 or section 4019 of this title.
6 (b) A person who transfers a firearm to another unlicensed person in
7 violation of subsection (a) of this section shall be imprisoned not more than
8 one year or fined not more than $500.00, or both.
9 Fifth: By adding a new Sec. 12 to read as follows:
10 Sec. 12. 13 V.S.A. § 4004 is amended to read:
13 (a) No person shall knowingly possess a firearm or a dangerous or deadly
14 weapon while within a school building or on a school bus. A person who
15 violates this section shall, for the first offense, be imprisoned not more than
16 one year or fined not more than $1,000.00, or both, and for a second or
17 subsequent offense shall be imprisoned not more than three years or fined no
18 more than $5,000.00, or both.
19 (b) No person shall knowingly possess a firearm or a dangerous or deadly
20 weapon on any school property with the intent to injure another person. A
21 person who violates this section shall, for the first offense, be imprisoned no

(Draft No. 1.1 – S.55) Page 8 of 9
3/13/2018 - EBF - 01:21 PM
1 more than two years or fined not more than $1,000.00, or both, and for a
2 second or subsequent offense shall be imprisoned not more than three years or
3 fined not more than $5,000.00, or both.
4 (c) This section shall not apply to:
5 (1) A law enforcement officer:
6 (A) while engaged in law enforcement duties; or
7 (B) in possession of a concealed firearm in accordance with 18
8 U.S.C. § 926B.
9 (2) Possession and use of firearms or dangerous or deadly weapons if the
10 board of school directors, or the superintendent or principal if delegated
11 authority to do so by the board, authorizes possession or use for specific
12 occasions or for instructional or other specific purposes.
13 (d) As used in this section:
14 (1) “School property” means any property owned by a school, including
15 motor vehicles.
16 (2) “Owned by the school” means owned, leased, controlled or
17 subcontracted by the school.
18 (3) “Dangerous or deadly weapon” has the meaning defined in section
19 4016 of this title.
20 (4) “Firearm” has the meaning defined in section 4016 of this title.

(Draft No. 1.1 – S.55) P
3/13/2018 - EBF - 01:21 PM
1 (5) “Law enforcement officer” has the meaning defined in sect
2 of this title.
3 (e) The provisions of this section shall not limit or restrict any pro
4 for any other offense, including simple assault or aggravated assault.
6 And by renumbering existing Sec. 8 to be Sec. 13

Fishing Opportunities
Vermont is chock-full of world-class fishing opportunities for anglers of all ages, abilities and interests.

Fish Thumbnail

Fish Stocking
Each year more than a million fish are reared and released to help restore fish populations and enhance angling opportunities.

access sign

Boating in Vermont
Finding boatable water is always close at hand with Vermont's hundreds of lakes and ponds, and many miles of rivers.

Tackle Box

Fishing Regulations
Fishing regulations help protect Vermont's fisheries while providing for a variety of fishing opportunities.

Girl holding fish

Fishing Events and Programs
From how-to fishing clinics to recognizing anglers who catching "exceptionally-sized" fish, the department has many fishing events and programs happening throughout the year.

Composting and Bears: Adjusting to Vermont's Universal Recycling Law
Bears in Vermont are already thinking about winter, and are currently in search of easy calories to fatten up. Residential trash bins, bird feeders, pet food, and beehives can become bear attractants if not properly secured. Composting in bear country may also be an issue, and many residents wonder how to compost without enticing curious bears. 
While food scraps left outside in trash cans or composters may attract hungry bears, Vermonters can take a few measures to minimize conflicts, according to Forrest Hammond, bear project leader with Vermont Fish & Wildlife.
"With more Vermonters choosing to compost, we want to help them prevent any potential problems with bears," said Hammond.  "People can effectively reduce the chances of bears causing damage to their property and protect the bears as well."


Hunter Ed Courses Available Now, Not Later
If you haven't completed a Vermont hunter education course but want to before hunting seasons, this is the time to act according to the Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department.
"Vermont's volunteer instructors of hunter education courses are scheduling their courses now on Vermont Fish & Wildlife's website," said Nicole Meier, hunter education specialist.  "The courses have started and will continue for a few weeks, and fewer courses will be available by October because many instructors will be hunting."
The list of upcoming course is updated on the website as new courses are added, and course news is included on the Vermont Hunter Education Program Facebook page.  For more information, class dates, and information about free hunting seminars, check out our Hunter Education registration page by clicking here...


Vermont Turkey Brood Survey Starts Aug. 1
Wild turkeys are found throughout most of Vermont, but their reproductive success is monitored annually by the Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department with a little help from "citizen scientists" who report the number and size of turkey families they see during August.  
Fish & Wildlife is again asking the public for help.  If you see a group of young turkeys in Vermont during August, the department wants you to go to the turkey brood survey on its website by clicking here... You can record where and when you observed the number of adult and young turkeys, or poults.

Women in the Outdoors Event, Aug. 15 at Buck Lake

 The Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department and Vermont chapters of the National Wild Turkey Federation are putting on a one-day "Women in the Outdoors" introductory course on Saturday, August 15 at Buck Lake in Woodbury VT.

"This is a great opportunity if you want to learn about some of the exciting outdoor activities we have in Vermont that enable us to actively enjoy our fish and wildlife resources," said Nicole Corrao, a Fish & Wildlife Education Specialist. "We will have a guided wildlife identification walk, basic shooting instruction, turkey hunting tactics, fly fishing basics, and more - all taught by highly experienced instructors."
Pre-registration is required through Ron Lafreniere with the National Wild Turkey Federation, the cost is $35. Registration fee includes lunch and all materials for the day.





 Proposed Changes to the Deer Rule

Dear Members of F&W Board,


I wanted to provide my personal opinion on the new deer rule you are considering.
First, I agree 100% with the FWB s decision that the new rule take affect this 2015 deer season.  I know the FWD will disagree and try to delay but there is no good reason as there are multiple avenues to disseminate the information and the FWD s only real reason is to continue to delay change any change.  There is plenty of time to get the word out, in fact, much more time then the waterfowl hunters get each year.
Issue 1:  Antler Restrictions I believe the AR s should be ended as Adam s data (and common sense at this point) reveal we are quite possibly inflicting genetic damage to our beloved deer herd.  This is NOT a Social Issue this is a Biological Issue and I am bitterly disappointed in the Commissioner s failure to step up and lead but rather take the politically easy path.  The FWB can correct this and should return us to the old definition of a legal buck. 
The FWD claims it needs three more years of data gathering to determine the impact of AR s well, they have had close to ten years time already and cannot say.  In three years, you will have an entirely new cast of characters sitting in front of you and wringing their hands over this issue and asking for more time.  If the Board decides to allow three more years of should demand the FWD reveal EXACTLY what data/parameters they need to study and EXACTLY what they need to know to make a decision I will guarantee you they do not know...
Issue 2:  Crossbows I believe it is time to include crossbows as a legal archery implement.  I know the FWB voted to permit crossbows for all age groups and I agree with this position.  However, if the FWB should reconsider and decide to allow crossbows for hunters age 50 and over to ease into this change, I would be supportive of that as well, with the thought being expansion to others down the road when it is proven that the world did not end.  I truly believe the use of crossbows will result in much better recovery rates of arrowed deer.
Issue 3: Bag Limits I believe, as long as the current AR s are in place, that we should have a one buck annual bag limit.  I believe this rule change would force hunters to be much more discerning on what buck they are willing to fill their only tag with and this is not easily measured but it will have a significant impact.  I support allowing doe permits and the total bag limit of three deer but it should only allow one buck.
Issue 4:  Extension of archery season I support this proposed change.  However, I believe a three day early Muzzleloader Season for filling doe permits ONLY should be established,  This early ML season should end on the last Sunday in October and begin two days earlier on that Friday.  Then, I believe the archery season should be extended through the end of October rather than earlier as proposed.  I believe the EXISTING ML season should NOT be changed other than the proposed bag limit change.

Issue 5:  Banning of urine based attractants I can t wait to see how the Warden force will be expected to enforce this.  I do not want wardens sniffing my pant legs and boots at the check in stations but we shall see.

Thank you for your service on the Board.  I believe it is time for the FWB to take the lead as the Department has showed itself unable or unwilling to do so.  I wish you the best of luck.

Thank you,
Ed Gallo
Richmond, Vt.



Press Release


For Immediate Release: February 11, 2015

Media Contact: Adam Miller, (802) 777-2852


Vermont fish hatcheries in high gear during winter months 

BENNINGTON, Vt. While the bitter cold of winter grips Vermont and ice covers many of its world-class fisheries, work at the state s fish hatcheries is heating up to produce the next batch of fish for spring stocking efforts - an annual initiative that has a major impact on both area angling opportunities and Vermont s economy.

A lot of people might not know this, but winter is a very busy and important time for our various hatcheries and the work they do to raise fish, said Adam Miller, fish culture operations manager with Vermont Fish & Wildlife. 

The fish-rearing process first begins two years prior to fish stocking when highly trained fisheries biologists from the Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department develop annual plans outlining how many fish will be needed for stocking Vermont s public waters. They then team up with fish culturists to collect eggs from large brood fish in the wild, or at various hatchery sites in the fall months, to meet the stocking needs of the State.

The eggs are then moved into incubators at the hatcheries to develop before eventually hatching into small sac fry, also known as alevin. 

The newly hatched fish are called sac fry because the young fish are still living off a yolk sac attached to their bodies, providing the fish with nourishment, said Miller. During the incubation stage, hatchery staff spend a large amount of time caring for the eggs and ensuring that they have the optimal environment to grow, develop and hatch.

Once the eggs hatch into sac fry, hatchery staff begin to introduce the fish to food.

Fish must learn to feed before they ve used up all of their yolk sac or else they ll die, Miller said.

Once fish are on feed, fish culture staff continue feeding them and cleaning holding tanks - a critical process for providing a healthy, disease-free environment while the fish are developing an immune system.

Staff work extremely hard, around-the-clock at times, to ensure that these conditions are conducive to proper development, Miller said.

As winter winds down and spring approaches, hatchery staff prepare for a busy stocking season that will see them not only stocking Vermont waterways with adult fish raised during the previous year, but also moving this year s young fish into larger rearing environments so they can continue to grow.

Vermont fish hatcheries produce fish for two main reasons - to restore fisheries and to increase angling opportunities, said Louis Porter, commissioner of Vermont Fish & Wildlife. In addition to biologically meeting fisheries management goals, hatchery-raised fish also serve as a great outreach tool to get people involved in fishing and the outdoors.

In recent years, approximately 6,500 individuals have participated annually in the Children s Fishing program - a collaborative effort with local sporting clubs across Vermont to provide fish for local fishing events.  The program provides senior citizens, kids, and disabled individuals an increased opportunity of catching fish in an environment favorable to fishing. 

More than 600 people have also participated in the Grand Isle Family Fishing Festival, an annual event where kids learn about fishing and try to catch hatchery-raised fish. 

Additionally, an average of 15,000 people visit Vermont hatcheries each year to see the fish and learn about the fish culture process.

Stocked fish are also an important economic driver for the State of Vermont, added Porter. The 2011 U.S. Fish & Wildlife survey on hunting, fishing and wildlife-associated recreation, coupled with our 2010 Vermont angler survey, estimated that stocked fish contribute roughly $31.6 million annually in angler expenditures to Vermont s economy.

In total, Vermont s hatchery system - which includes facilities in Newark, Bennington, Grand Isle, Roxbury and Salisbury - produces approximately 1.5 million fish for stocking each year. That number includes a range of species including brook, brown, rainbow, lake and steelhead trout, as well as walleye and landlocked Atlantic salmon.

By design our hatcheries enable us to properly manage the state s fisheries, and that s priority number one, said Miller. But it goes beyond that - they re a symbol of Vermont s commitment to our natural resources, a wonderful tool for public education and an important component of the state s history. Three of the five hatcheries are on the National Register of Historic Sites.  They re really a long-standing part of the environmental fabric of the state and that s certainly evident during the winter when staff are working tirelessly to raise yet another generation of healthy Vermont fish.


Here is Ashley's story in her own words
2013 Special Moose Hunt
Ashleys Moose

On October 18 through the 24th I was given the opportunity to go on a moose hunt sponsored by the Hunters Anglers Trappers Association of Vermont (HAT). Each year HAT selects a youth with a disability to go on this potential once in a lifetime hunt.
            It was such an amazing privilege to be able to go out moose hunting, being the first girl selected for the permit and getting to spend time with the super friendly, down to earth guys made it even better. I don t think I slept at all the night before opening morning; I was too excited. But when that morning finally came, I didn t know what to expect. I got all my gear on and was ready to go right away.
            On the drive to the wildlife management in area in Walden, Vermont that we would be hunting in, my guide, Ed Gallo, was telling me that if I saw a moose and decided that I didn t want to shoot it then no one would be upset with me. They put me in front of a moose and that s what they were supposed to do. I looked at Ed and said, If I see a legal moose, I m shooting it. I m not going to pass one up.
            We had been hiking through the woods about 4 hours and decided to stop and use the moose call to try to call one in. After using it, we didn t get a response so we got up and started hiking through the swamp again.
            Following Ed, we had only taken about 30 steps when he suddenly stops dead in his tracks. Him being so tall and myself being only 5 2, I couldn t see what he was looking at. Then before I had time to think, he turns around grabs my shoulders and moves me in front of him.
            Ashley, right there. He tells me while pointing about 50 yards in front of me. And standing right there in front of me was a cow moose. She had seen our movement though and had blocked herself off behind some trees so we could only see her head and hindquarters. I pull my 30.06 up to my shoulder and look through the scope to get a better glimpse. She stood there for what seemed like minutes but in all reality was only seconds. When the moose finally started walking I could hear Ed telling me something about as soon as I get a decent broadside shot, to shoot; before he could even finish his sentence, I shot my rifle.
I got it in the first shot; a perfect heart/lung shot, standing up free hand, which I have never really done before. After my first shot though, she was still standing so my dad and I got two more shots off (one him, one me). Then she only walked about 10 yards and dropped. We saw her fall, but then it was a matter of locating her.
I was so excited. I would have been running if we weren t in a swamp. I could feel the adrenaline pumping so much that I was jittery. Nothing in the world could top that feeling. The pride of my very first big game animal in the entire six years I have been hunting. I had been expecting to see a moose within the weeklong season but not within the first 4 and half hours of opening day.
I was happy I got one but disappointed it was already over. It was such a memorable and enjoyable experience that I will carry with me for the rest of my life. It wouldn t have been this way though without all the amazing men that accompanied me in my hunt. They made it so much fun and they did a great job making me feel at home and comfortable the entire time I was there.

2013 Special Moose Hunt

Tribute Page for Ian

VT Fish and Wildlife weekly Shoot Out



For Immediate Release:  July 23, 2013
Media Contacts:  Mary Childs 802-241-3720, Charlee Drury 802-241-3700
Intro to Waterfowl Hunting Seminar to be Held at Missisquoi NWR
The Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department will host a free seminar entitled Introduction to Waterfowl Hunting at the Missisquoi National Wildlife Refuge on August 24,, 2013.  The seminar follows the curriculum of the popular Junior Waterfowl Hunter Training Program and will provide hunters of all ages with the opportunity to learn about waterfowl hunting.
Fish & Wildlife Warden Dan Swainbank and retired waterfowl biologist Bill Crenshaw will present on waterfowl hunting regulations, waterfowl identification, safety and ethics, and where to waterfowl hunt.  They will demonstrate the use of decoys and blinds, and will give advice on guns and ammunition used for waterfowl hunting. Additionally, the Lake Champlain Retriever Club will demonstrate the advantages of using a retriever on waterfowl hunts.
The seminar will take place from 9 a.m. - 3 p.m. and lunch will be provided.  Registration is required by calling Mary Childs at (802) 241-3720 or by emailing  Please provide your full name, address, and phone number.  You will receive a confirmation letter, including directions, following registration. 
Press Release
For Immediate Release:  July 24, 2013
Media Contacts:  David Sausville, 802-878-1564; Mark Scott, 802-241-3700
Migratory Game Bird Hunters Must Register
for Harvest Information Program
Montpelier, Vt All Vermont migratory game bird hunters, including youth, permanent and lifetime license holders, must register with the Federal Harvest Information Program (H..I.P.) each year in each state that you hunt. 
The Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department provides migratory game bird hunters with a H.I.P. registration process online and by phone.  Vermont, like other states, is required to annually provide a list of hunter names to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.  The list is used for their national migratory game bird harvest surveys..
H.I.P. enables the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (U.S.F.W.S.) and state fish and wildlife agencies to develop reliable estimates of the number of migratory game birds harvested throughout the country.  These estimates are important in making sound decisions about setting hunting season dates, bag limits and population management for ducks, geese, coots, snipe, and woodcock.           
Hunters of migratory game birds are required to register on Vermont Fish & Wildlife s website ( or by calling toll- free 1-877-306-7091.  After providing basic information, you will receive your annual H.I.P. registration number which you need to record on the H.I.P. section of your hunting license. 
Hunters who have a permanent or lifetime Vermont hunting license should print out the website response form showing the H.I.P. number and carry this with them while hunting.  Permanent and lifetime license holders who register by telephone between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday will receive a number over the phone for their license. 
Hunters who have registered for H.I.P. and have lost their license or H.I.P. number can look up their number on Vermont Fish & Wildlife s website. 
John Hall, Outreach Division
[phone]      802-241-3700      [fax]      802-828-1250
Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department
1 National Life Drive, Davis 2
Montpelier VT 0562      
For Immediate Release: July 15, 2013
Media Contacts: Vermont - David Sausville -- (802) 878-1564
New York David Winchell (518) 897-1248
Waterfowl Meetings -- Aug. 6, Whitehall, NY -- Aug. 7, Burlington, VT
Public meetings on the status of waterfowl populations and waterfowl hunting seasons for the State of Vermont and Lake Champlain zone in New York will be held Tuesday, August 6, in Whitehall, New York, and Wednesday, August 7, in Burlington, Vermont.  The annual meetings are being held by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department.  
The August 6 meeting will be held at the Skenesborough Rescue Squad building in Whitehall, New York.  The August 7 meeting will be held at the University of Vermont s Billings Lecture Hall.  Both meetings will run from 7 p.m. - 9 p.m.  Those attending the Burlington, Vermont meeting should park off Colchester Avenue.
Vermont and New York waterfowl hunters are encouraged to attend one of these meetings and share their preferences and opinions with other waterfowl hunters and Vermont and New York wildlife personnel. 
Under Federal regulations, waterfowl seasons, bag limits, and shooting hours in the Lake Champlain Zone must be uniform throughout the entire zone.  Therefore, waterfowl seasons in New York s portion of the Lake Champlain Zone must be identical to the waterfowl season in Vermont s portion of the Zone.
Comments received at the August meetings, as well as input and recommendations from the Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department and the New York Department of Environmental Conservation, will be reviewed by the Vermont Fish & Wildlife Board.  


For Immediate Release: June 26, 2013

Media Contacts: Scott Darling, 802-786-3862; Mark Scott, 802-241-3700

Public Hearings July 23 and 25 on Wildlife Unit Changes

MONTPELIER, Vt State wildlife biologists with the Vermont Fish &
Wildlife Department are recommending changes to the boundaries of some
of Vermont s 24 Wildlife Management Units (WMUs).

The Fish & Wildlife Board is holding two public hearings on the
proposal beginning at 7:00 p.m. on July 23 at the Town Hall, 49 Mill
Street, Island Pond, and on July 25 at Hartford High School, 37
Highland Avenue, White River Junction.

The biologists often recommend hunting regulations tailored to specific
WMUs. The WMUs were created in in the 1970s based on their habitat
conditions, climate, size, and species densities to help manage deer
populations on a regional basis. In recent years, hunting regulations
for wild turkey, moose, furbearers, and snowshoe hare also have been
added that are specific to certain WMUs.

Biologists have noticed that some WMUs now have habitat conditions that
are more similar to those in adjoining units. They also have found
that the sample sizes of biological data from the smaller subunits have
not been adequate. In addition, the implementation of the 9-1-1
program created changes in town highway names and numbers.

In response, the Fish & Wildlife Department recently presented a
recommendation to the Fish & Wildlife Board to update some WMU
boundaries as follows:

1) Combining K1 and K2 into a single WMU K,

2) Adjust the eastern boundary of WMU Q to avoid the Connecticut River

3) Combine M2 and O2 into a single WMU O that extends along the
Connecticut River Valley to the Massachusetts border,

4) Combine M1 and O1 into a single WMU M,

5) Extend J2 north along the Connecticut River to include that valley
habitat currently within H2 and E,

6) Combine H1 and the mountainous portion of H2 into a single WMU H,

7) Expand the western border of E to include similar habitat currently
within WMU D2, and

8) Expand the northeastern boundary of D1 easterly to include farmland
currently in WMU D2.

The department s recommendation is on its website
(<>). Under
Law Enforcement, click on Rules and Proposed Rules.


John Hall, Outreach Division
[phone] 802-241-3700 [fax] 802-828-1250

Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department
1 National Life Drive, Davis 2
Montpelier VT 05620-3702

Press Release

For Immediate Release: February 6, 2013
Media Contact: Col. David LeCours, 802-583-7161

Anyone contemplating violating Vermont s fish and wildlife laws now needs to keep in mind that they can no longer just hunt, fish or trap in another state if their licenses are revoked here. Vermont is now the 39th member of the Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact (IWVC), which recognizes license suspensions of member states.

Any person whose license privileges are suspended in one compact member state will have his or her licenses suspended in all other compact member states. The IWVC assures that in participating states, nonresident violators will receive the same treatment as resident violators.

A violator who fails to comply with the terms of a citation issued in a participating state also faces the possibility of suspension of their wildlife license privileges in the other member states until the terms of the citation are met. The goal of the IWVC is to improve enforcement of hunting, fishing and trapping laws through the cooperation of law enforcement units in member states.

Joining the IWVC provides an added deterrent to Vermonters who might be tempted to violate fish and wildlife laws at home and then expect to hunt, fish or trap in other states or vice versa, said Col. David LeCours. Also, we didn t want Vermont to be one of the last states where bad actors from other states can come to violate our fish and wildlife laws.


Press Release

For Immediate Release: January 30, 2013

Media Contact: David Sausville 802-878-1564; Scott Darling 802-786-3862

Special Snow Goose Harvest Opportunity


Since 2009 hunters have had the opportunity to pursue snow geese during the spring as a result of a special management action referred to as a Conservation Order allowed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and adopted by the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Board.

The measure was adopted at the recommendation of federal and state wildlife scientists in response to concerns about a growing number of snow geese across North America. Eight states in the Atlantic Flyway (Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Vermont) will hold a Spring Snow Goose Conservation Order in 2013.

The Vermont 2013 Spring Snow Goose Conservation Order will occur statewide from March 11 through April 26. The daily bag limit is 15 snow geese, and there is no possession limit. Waterfowl hunting regulations in effect last fall will apply during the 2013 Spring Snow Goose Conservation Order with the exception that unplugged shotguns and electronic calls may be used, and shooting hours will be extended until hour after sunset.

A 2013 Spring Snow Goose Harvest Permit is required and is available at no charge on the Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department s website ( Hunters may also call the Essex Junction Office (802-878-1564) to request a permit.

In addition to this permit, hunters will need a 2013 Vermont hunting license (residents $22, nonresidents $50), 2013 Harvest Information Program (HIP) certification, a 2012 federal migratory hunting stamp ($15), and a 2013 Vermont migratory waterfowl stamp ($7.50). Hunters can register with the Harvest Information Program by going to the department website or calling toll free 1-877-306-7091 during normal business hours.

The populations of snow geese, blue geese and Ross s geese in North America, collectively referred to as light geese, have grown to record levels over the past three decades.

According to the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the overabundance of light geese, which nest in far northern regions of North America, is harming their fragile arctic breeding habitat. The damage to the habitat is, in turn, harming the health of the light geese and other bird species that depend on the tundra habitat. Returning the light goose population to sustainable levels is necessary to protect this delicate habitat and every species dependent on it.

Greater snow geese make up a large share of the light goose population in the Atlantic Flyway.

The population of greater snow geese has grown from approximately 50,000 birds in the mid-1960s to 1 million today, said David Sausville, Vermont s waterfowl project biologist. This increase has resulted in damage to agricultural crops and marsh vegetation in staging and wintering areas from Quebec to North Carolina. The Atlantic Flyway has established a goal of 500,000 greater snow geese to bring populations in balance with their habitat and reduce crop depredation.

Hunters who obtain a permit will be required to complete an online survey after April 26 and prior to May 16, 2013, whether they hunted or not. Hunters without access to the internet may obtain a copy of the survey by calling 802-878-1564.

The Spring Snow Goose hunt occurs annually from March 11 until the Friday before Youth Turkey Weekend.

During spring migration, snow geese typically move through the Champlain Valley in late March and early April. They usually pass through Vermont fairly quickly in route to their spring staging areas along the St. Lawrence River Valley. Here they remain for about a month before moving on to their nesting areas in the Eastern Canadian Arctic. About 100 snow geese are taken by Vermont hunters during the spring seasons.

Date: Wed, Jan 16, 2013 - 09:37 PM ET
Website Address:
Gun range prohibits police after city considers ban
BURLINGTON, Vt. -- A rural Vermont firing range has told the police department in Burlington that its officers are unwelcome to train at the facility because the City Council has advanced a measure to ban semi-automatic rifles and large-capacity magazines in the state's largest city.
The City Council's action earlier this month threatens constitutional freedoms, Robert Boivin II, board chairman of the Lamoille Valley Fish and Game Club Inc., wrote in a letter to police department, city and state leaders terminating use of the gun range by Burlington police.
The firing range is in Morrisville, about 50 miles northeast of Burlington. The city of 42,000 residents has a police force of just less than 100 officers.
The club's executive board "can no longer support the City of Burlington with such a prejudice against our club and its members, and has voted to suspend the City's use of our range for its law enforcement. This action is effective immediately," Boivin wrote in the letter, dated Tuesday. It was provided Wednesday to The Burlington Free Press.
"We hope that the council reconsiders its actions and redirects its efforts towards perpetrators of violent crimes and security issues," Boivin wrote


DEC's official press release on spiny water fleas 8.1.12

Spiny Water Flea Confirmed in Lake George


Bear Tags

The change will not affect hunters who purchase a lifetime or permanent license in year 2012 or earlier. Starting when the new early season tag goes into effect, it will be treated as an add-on tag, such as we do with turkey. Their regular bear tag will be valid for the extra five days in November deer season.

Here s a complete list on how we intend to handle the bear tags:

1) RE: All previous term licenses for hunting that cover multiple years, that have been issued a black bear tag. These tags are valid for both the Early and Late black bear season. No additional tags need to be issued to these license holders. If these license holders harvest a black bear, they will continue to be reissued a bear tag that is valid in both Early and Late seasons for the duration of these licenses. These license types include lifetimes (kids as you refer), permanents and 5 year hunting.

2) Department in calendar year 2013 will issue two black bear tags for new license sold. Traditional hunting license or combination hunting\fishing licenses will be issued with a tag designated Late Season to cover the bear season as it overlaps with the rifle deer season in November. A second tag designated Early Season will be issued if requested for the open black bear season that does not overlap the November rifle deer season. The Department will charge $5.00 for this early season tag.

3) In 2013, in order to purchase a new hunting license of any type the license buyer will be asked Did you hunt black bears last year or some variation of this question. This question will be used as a screening tool for future surveys to determine hunters who may have hunted black bears in an systematic attempt to subsequently survey hunters regarding hunting pressure, effort or other questions. This question will be in effect for electronic and book agent license sales.

4) Big Game Reporting stations in 2013 will be instructed to take the remaining black bear tag when a successful hunter presents a harvested bear to be checked. This will hopefully ensure they do not accidentally get confused and go shoot another bear with the remaining tag.

Tables turned on Humane Society

Jim Matthews, Outdoors
Posted: 07/26/2012 08:32:04 PM PDT

The Humane Society of the United States, an organization that does next to nothing for animal shelters but sues, badgers and lobbies politicians and businesses into adopting its radical animals rights agenda, is getting a taste of its own medicine.

In a little-reported ruling by a judge in the District of Columbia earlier this month, the HSUS is facing allegations under RICO statues on racketeering, obstruction of justice, malicious prosecution and other claims for a lawsuit it brought and lost against Ringling Brothers Circus' parent company Feld Entertainment, Inc.

After winning the case alleging mistreatment of elephants in its circuses brought by Friends of Animals (later merged into HSUS), the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) and the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI), lawyers at Feld filed a countersuit with a litany of claims ranging from bribery to money laundering to racketeering. The attorneys for the animal rights groups asked the judge to dismiss all of the claims, but most survived. So in early August, HSUS will be facing the music in a case that should attract the attention of hunters, ranchers, farmers and anyone impacted by HSUS' radical animal rights agenda.

District judge Emmet G. Sullivan did dismiss allegations of mail and wire fraud, but he did so only because Feld didn't have standing to file this charge. His ruling all but set the stage for a class-action RICO lawsuit against HSUS for misrepresenting itself in its fundraising campaigns across the nation. This lawsuit easily could bankrupt HSUS, put it out of business and send some of its top executives to prison.

For the first time, a group has fought back against the animal rights and environmental extremists who have been setting policy in this country for the past 20 years or more. Now, instead of getting rich off their lawsuits and fundraising schemes that misrepresent their efforts and accomplishments, they could be driven out of business. These groups have cost the farming and ranching industry jobs and raised the price of products we buy every day. They are behind the efforts to ban sport hunting across the nation. They have forced state wildlife and fishery agencies to waste countless millions of dollars on lawsuits and have spearheaded policies and legislation like the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA), which has ruined livelihoods in recreational and commercial fishing without helping marine resources.

These groups operate with surly arrogance and believe they are above the law. Thankfully, that is not the case. Stay tuned.

UVM Political Science Students making
UNAUTHORIZED site "safety" inspect...


The E-mail below should have included that immediately after the Vermont AG/Acting Commissioner released the "Get the Lead Out of Vermont" report in February, 2007, the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers Institute (SAAMI) issued a position paper dismantling the firearms and range

section of the Vermont report. The Vermont lead report was pseudo science.

--------------------------Original E-mail released 4/25/12----------------------------

Last Friday I became aware that UVM students had been making site visits to Vermont gun ranges. I learned this because an officer of the North Country Sportsmen's Club (NSCS) in Williston encountered three UVM students on the club property.

The students were informed they should have eye and ear protection and they were there without permission. asked what they were doing on the property they related they were there to do a site inspection for a study requested by Chittenden County State Senator "Ginny" Lyons.

The NCSC officer contacted Senator Lyons and it turns out they were doing this site inspection at the instruction of UVM Professor Anthony "Jack" Gierzynski, who is an Internship Director for the UVM Political Science Department.

The study was checking for lead management and was being performed as a research project for the Vermont Legislative Research of the James M. Jeffords Center.

The UVM students impressed the NCSC officer as not having any real working knowledge of firearms or ranges. They also showed up a range without ear or eye protection. The officer related they did not have any writing or recording materials or devices.

The NCSC officer contacted Professor Gierzynski to get access to the completed research report. What he received was what is reportedly a "rough draft" of the study and it is provided as an attachment to this E-mail.

The report is incorporated into a previous study performed about ranges. It was requested by Senator Lyons in an apparent reaction to an April, 2011 article about ranges in Seven Days Magazine.

The original study was lacking in objectivity and the level of the work was quite disappointing for a college of the standing of UVM. This one is no better.

Starting on Page 9 the study reports the UVM students visited four ranges in Vermont. The Bulleye's range, Barre Fish & Game Club, Waterbury-Stowe Club and the North Country Sportsmen's Club in Williston were reviewed in March and April... Apparently, the ranges visited were selected because they had shotgun ranges.

In February, 2007 the Vermont Attorney General and Acting Commissioner of Health issued the report "Get the Lead Out of Vermont" which had three pages dedicated to ranges and specifically targeted skeet and trap ranges.

This raises important questions:

Is it ethical for a faculty academic research leader to dispatch students to private property for data gathering unannounced inspections without the permission or prior knowledge of the property owner?

Given the fact that UVM receives funding support from your taxes, do Vermont taxpayers want to have their tax dollars funding research that is clearly biased and certainly appears to be driven to justify the goal of finding ranges as bad actors?

Do the graduates of UVM want to continue to donate to the college so long as it engages in these type of research projects.

Is it a sound safety practice for UVM students to be dispatched to ranges for a research project without ear and eye protection?

Concerned about this situation? You should be. In Vermont there used to be respect for private property. Apparently clubs and ranges are sufficiently Politically Incorrect to the point that UVM students on a mission for a state senator just show up and traipse all over the property. All in the name of ethical research.

The UVM President's Office is located at 85 South Prospect Street, 344-353 Waterman Building, Burlington, Vermont 05405. Tel. 802-656-3186


As a Richmond resident you may already know our club has been involved in an ongoing legal battle with a few neighbors who don t like the fact an organization that has been in operation since 1926, long before any of them moved in, is still there.

We are an essential part of Richmond s recreational outlets for hundreds of residents and added to the town s quality of life for over 250members in just the last decade.

After multiple hearings with the town boards, 3 court sessions (including Vermont Supreme Court) the issue is coming to a head after 10 years.

All this came about by unsubstantiated testimony in the original 2003 court case. That led the judge to rule we had expanded usage by 2X since enactment of the zoning laws in 1969, and now the town is seeking to require us to cut usage in half, under a zoning Notice of Violation . In 1969 we had 2000 members, allowed unlimited guests and operated from dawn to dark, as opposed to 7-800 members now, no guests and reduced hours.

The Town Select Board has apparently approved the hiring of counsel to represent the Town, and its zoning administrator, in the Club s appeal of the Notice of Violation, to the Town Development Review Board.

If you enjoy the use of the range, archery, ponds, etc. and think this action an injustice, it is critical you come to the Development Review Board at the town hall on Wednesday, April 11th for the 7 pm meeting to show your support. Please make the effort to attend for your own benefit and we are sure all will be respectful as we always have been.

Thank you, and hope to see you there..


HAT Survey Results

Would you support a $10.00 surcharge on each ADULT hunting license sale which MUST be deposited into an escrow account to be used solely for DEER WINTER HABITAT improvement on both public and private lands?
Yes 653
No 40
Not Sure 7

This money would add up quickly with approximately 80,000 licenses sold per year ($800,000 annually) and give the Dept. some real funds to put in place a great program that would definitely help the deer herd. The key point here is that the FWD can ONLY spend this money on deer winter habitat improvement which will directly affect the numbers of deer in Vermont. The FWD would be required to set this money aside to be used soley for deer winter habitat (deer yard) improvement on public and private lands. The FWD would be entitled to a 10% management fee of the fund ONLY the balance MUST be used for deer yard improvements such as:

a) paying landowners an exclusive management rights lease on deer yards for a fixed time duration. Any lands placed under this management must remain open to the public for hunting.
b) Purchase & management of deer yards particularly where it is already adjacent or near a WMA
c) paying foresters to do selective cutting and tree planting to improve deer yard quality
d) GIS mapping of deer yards would be permitted use of these funds
e) Winter deer density studies (inside the deer yard to establish carrying capacities) would be approved use of these funds
f) other projects that may arise that directly improve deer winter habitat

Note: the Vt FWD already has on staff a Habitat Biologist whose mission is to improve habitat on State-owned lands for all species in Vermont. This proposal focuses on sportsmen paying for deer winter habitat specifically.

Vermont Watershed Grant Recipients - 2012    
Proj # Project Name Project Sponsor Amount
8-12 Woodford River Corridor Plan Bennington County Conservation District $15,000
9-12 Lake Fairlee Shoreland Buffer Demonstration Project Lake Fairlee Association $5,000
12-12 Calais Lakes and Streams Newsletters and Community Outreach Town of Calais $2,700
13-12 New Haven River Anglers Association Muddy Branch Tributary Project New Haven River Anglers Association $1,500
20-12 Connecticut River Paddlers Trail Campsite Stewardship Program and the Nulhegan River Interpretive Trail Project The Vermont River Conservancy $5,000
22-12 White River Watershed Stewardship Project White River Partnership $13,613
24-12 After the Floods: Vermont's Rivers and the Legacy of Irene Riverbank Media, Inc. $3,500
27-12 Mettowee River Watershed Protection Project Poultney Mettowee Conservation District $9,500
29-12 VYCC Watershed Training and Restoration Project Vermont Youth Conservation Corps $6,000
31-12 Transportation Infrastructure Flood Resiliency Project Caledonia County Natural Resources Conservation District $4,800
33-12 Trees for Streams 2012 Lamoille County Conservation District $6,000
35-12 Mad River Private Culvert Upgrade Initiative Friends of the Mad River $5,560
36-12 Road Foreman Workshop Series: Best Management Practices to address transportation related stormwater runoff Lamoille County Planning Commission $7,635
39-12 2012 Spotlight on Franklin County Conservation Stewards Franklin County Natural Resources Conservation District $2,520
40-12 Habitat Restoration in the Dog and Mad River Watersheds Winooski Soil and Water Conservation District $14,360
43-12 "Swimming Hole in Every Town" The Vermont River Conservancy $4,612
44-12 Windham County Trees for Streams 2012 Windham County Natural Resouces Conservation District  $12,700















Deen of Westminster, Chair

David Deen

(802) 869-3116


McCullough of Williston, Vice Chair

Jim McCullough

(802) 878-2180


Lewis of Derby, Ranking Member

Bob Lewis

(802) 766-8824


Degree of St. Albans City

Dustin Degree

(802) 782-4507


Fagan of Rutland City

Peter Fagan

(802) 342-1214


Krebs of South Hero

Bob Krebs

(802) 372-4567


Leriche of Hardwick

Lucy Leriche

(802) 472-5738


Munger of South Burlington

Bert Munger

(802) 652-4609


Webb of Shelburne, Clerk

Kate Webb

(802) 985-2789



Scott Carter of Barnet , Vt with his pending state record buck he shot in Vermont s 2010 muzzleloader season.  Carter s buck green-scored 157 6/8 by the Vermont Big Game Trophy Club


Coyote with a Fawn
Game Cam Photo by Greg Perrotte of Bakersfield 

Register for H A T of Vermont email updates


Check out

Big Game Check Station List

The Vermont Legislature

Legislative Directory
2012-2013 Session



eXTReMe Tracker